We're sorry but this app doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.

This lesson's interactive features are locked, please to keep using them

Polars vs. Pandas

Polars and Pandas solve the same problem: DataFrame manipulation. They just take different approaches.

Feature Pandas Polars
Written in Python/Cython/C Rust
Speed Slower on big data Often faster
API style Indexing + methods Expressions
Row labels Has an index No index
Memory Often higher usage Often lower usage

Say we want to import a CSV of transaction data, filter for purchases over $100, and select just the customer ID and amount. In Pandas:

df = pd.read_csv("transactions.csv")
large_purchases = df[df["amount"] > 100][["customer_id", "amount"]]

And similarly in Polars:

import polars as pl

df = pl.read_csv("transactions.csv")
large_purchases = df.filter(pl.col("amount") > 100).select(["customer_id", "amount"])

Pandas often feels like accessing values in a Python dictionary: df["amount"], while Polars leans on explicit expressions: pl.col("amount") > 100.

Larger expressions tell Polars what we want, not just what to do right now. That gives Polars more freedom to optimize the work, especially in "lazy mode" (more on this later).

Pandas generally executes operations immediately. That's great for small, interactive analysis, but it can be less efficient in large pipelines.

For most use cases, both libraries work just fine. If you're building a larger data pipeline, Polars is often the more efficient choice.